[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170902103221.5gw5vtxxknprzgdr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:32:21 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more
clear and consistent
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:25:42PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > 2) Put "sp" in the clobbers list instead of as an i/o constraint. This
> > mostly works for GCC, and doesn't break clang. However, it causes
> > GCC to insert a "lea -0x10(%rbp),%rsp" in the epilogue of every
> > affected function.
>
> And maybe this extra instruction is negligible for performance and not a
> big deal? I might look at this one after the holiday too.
Please do statistics of how many functions are affected, on a defconfig-ish
kernel.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists