lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:35:00 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DEBUG] x86/refcount: split up refcount saturation
 handling


* Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:

> In support of debugging the problems Mike Galbraith has seen with
> x86-refcount vs gcc vs network refcounts...
> 
> This minimizes the differences between unchecked-refcount and x86-refcount
> by changing the refcount_dec() failure case to not saturate. The reporting
> of negative values is reduced to pr_warn from WARN to avoid spamming dmesg
> (which may impact race conditions). Ratelimiting is disabled just to be
> sure no reports are being dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  kernel/panic.c        |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

If this patch is still useful then please include it in your next refcount series. 
Better debuggability is always welcome.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists