lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:40:46 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v4.14: PCID support, 5-level
 paging support, Secure Memory Encryption support


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please pull the latest ... git tree from:
> >
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git ...
> 
> Hmm. My laptop (XPS 13) doesn't resume any more. It suspends, but
> doesn't come back from resume.
> 
> I immediately assumed it was the power management pulls I just did,
> but then I started bisecting, and now it's actually pointing into the
> various x86 pulls I did yesterday instead.
> 
> Now, I'm reasonably early in my bisection (so literally "somewhere
> between the 'docs-next' and the 'x86-mm-for-linus' pull), and maybe
> the problem isn't even entirely repeatable and my bisection has
> already gone off the rails, but I thought I'd give at least an early
> heads-up about this thing.
> 
> I'll have more as it bisects deeper into the merge window, but it
> might be a while.

Hm, just as background, there are no regression reports I'm aware of
against any of these trees, plus most of the dangerous commits have
been in linux-next for at least two weeks - the majority of them even
longer. The last 2-4 commits of x86/mm are fresher.

But it could be a regression in an older commit in x86/mm just as well,
triggered by you for the first time :-/

Does your laptop CPU have PCID support by any chance? The CPU coming
out of resume with PCID disabled and us not properly re-enabling it
might be a possible failure mode.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ