[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1504691919-30832-1-git-send-email-kehuanlin@pinecone.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:58:39 +0800
From: kehuanlin <chgokhl@...il.com>
To: vinholikatti@...il.com
Cc: jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kehuanlin@...econe.net
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: fix wrong command type of UTRD for UFSHCI v2.1
Since the command type of UTRD in UFS 2.1 specification is the same with
UFS 2.0. And it assumes the future UFS specification will follow the same
definition.
Signed-off-by: kehuanlin <kehuanlin@...econe.net>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 5bc9dc1..c33a2f8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -2195,10 +2195,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_devman_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
u32 upiu_flags;
int ret = 0;
- if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20)
- lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
- else
+ if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) ||
+ (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11))
lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE;
+ else
+ lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, DMA_NONE);
if (hba->dev_cmd.type == DEV_CMD_TYPE_QUERY)
@@ -2222,10 +2223,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_scsi_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
u32 upiu_flags;
int ret = 0;
- if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20)
- lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
- else
+ if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) ||
+ (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11))
lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_SCSI;
+ else
+ lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
if (likely(lrbp->cmd)) {
ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags,
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists