[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2RGZFc3_XpgyfuxwYy-vOoYkkamxQzma8JKwLjCCJasQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:53:51 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length.
>> Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against
>> gcc, see link below.
>
> The code has
>
> int pin
>
> does changing pin to unsigned int matter?
No difference, see also the gcc bugzilla report.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists