[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1504741330.7546.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 16:42:10 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: acpi: work around false-positive
-Wstring-overflow warning
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 21:53 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > As suggested by Andy, this changes the format string to have a fixed length.
> > > Since modifying the range check did not help, I also opened a bug against
> > > gcc, see link below.
> >
> > The code has
> >
> > int pin
> >
> > does changing pin to unsigned int matter?
>
> No difference, see also the gcc bugzilla report.
Perhaps the bug report does not apply here as the
function is casting a unsigned int to an int through
a pointer when the int could now be negative, the int
is tested for < 256 and is then printed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists