[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170907094015.c3kcmt4xbzhp6r4c@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:40:15 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and_iret label
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:36:46PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The only user was the 64-bit opportunistic SYSRET failure path, and
> that path didn't really need it. This change makes the
> opportunistic SYSRET code a bit more straightforward and gets rid of
> the label.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Btw, you need to refresh your stuff because of those UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
things. I get:
checking file arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
Hunk #1 succeeded at 245 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 308.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 637 (offset 88 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists