linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:40:15 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and_iret label

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:36:46PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The only user was the 64-bit opportunistic SYSRET failure path, and
> that path didn't really need it.  This change makes the
> opportunistic SYSRET code a bit more straightforward and gets rid of
> the label.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Btw, you need to refresh your stuff because of those UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
things. I get:

checking file arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
Hunk #1 succeeded at 245 (offset 5 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 308.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 637 (offset 88 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED

Otherwise

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.