[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170908080201.9592-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:02:01 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: remove redundant null check on eqe
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The pointer eqe is always non-null inside the while loop, so the
check to see if eqe is NULL is redudant and hence can be removed.
Detected by CoverityScan CID#1248693 ("Logically Dead Code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 8b119f87b51d..80036a9fae7f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -13760,9 +13760,6 @@ lpfc_sli4_hba_intr_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
* Process all the event on FCP fast-path EQ
*/
while ((eqe = lpfc_sli4_eq_get(fpeq))) {
- if (eqe == NULL)
- break;
-
ccount += lpfc_sli4_hba_handle_eqe(phba, eqe, hba_eqidx);
if (!(++ecount % fpeq->entry_repost) ||
ccount > LPFC_MAX_ISR_CQE)
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists