[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <339f06ce8efd42409bf5f91dfd064e7a@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:15:10 +0000
From: <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
To: <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <dvhart@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <hughsient@...il.com>,
<yehezkelshb@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Add driver to force WMI Thunderbolt controller power
status
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:07 AM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>
> Cc: dvhart@...radead.org; LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; platform-driver-
> x86@...r.kernel.org; Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>; Yehezkel Bernat
> <yehezkelshb@...il.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add driver to force WMI Thunderbolt controller power
> status
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 01:47:22PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
> I have a small comment which you might want to consider.
>
> > +static int intel_wmi_thunderbolt_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> > +{
> > + return sysfs_create_group(&wdev->dev.kobj, &tbt_attribute_group);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int intel_wmi_thunderbolt_remove(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> > +{
> > + sysfs_remove_group(&wdev->dev.kobj, &tbt_attribute_group);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> In order to notify userspace about this, what if you send KOBJ_CHANGE
> for the wdev when you add/remove this attribute?
Sure, makes sense to me. I'll send a follow up patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists