linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: allocate hid buffers for real worst case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:49:50 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: allocate hid buffers for real worst case

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 07:02:05AM -0700, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > From: Adrian Salido <salidoa@...gle.com>
> > 
> > The buffer allocation is not currently accounting for an extra byte for
> > the report id. This can cause an out of bounds access in function
> > i2c_hid_set_or_send_report() with reportID > 15.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> 
> Missing signoff from the patch author?

Oops, I must have cut it off on accident while removing ChromeOS
specific tags, the original commit is here:

https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/475212

> 
> Also, I think this should have Cc: stable, right?

I usually let maintainers decide, but yes.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry