[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170913144950.GA1122@dtor-ws>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:49:50 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: allocate hid buffers for real worst case
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 07:02:05AM -0700, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > From: Adrian Salido <salidoa@...gle.com>
> >
> > The buffer allocation is not currently accounting for an extra byte for
> > the report id. This can cause an out of bounds access in function
> > i2c_hid_set_or_send_report() with reportID > 15.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>
> Missing signoff from the patch author?
Oops, I must have cut it off on accident while removing ChromeOS
specific tags, the original commit is here:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/475212
>
> Also, I think this should have Cc: stable, right?
I usually let maintainers decide, but yes.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists