[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1709130751380.4703@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: allocate hid buffers for real worst case
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > From: Adrian Salido <salidoa@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > The buffer allocation is not currently accounting for an extra byte for
> > > the report id. This can cause an out of bounds access in function
> > > i2c_hid_set_or_send_report() with reportID > 15.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> >
> > Missing signoff from the patch author?
>
> Oops, I must have cut it off on accident while removing ChromeOS
> specific tags, the original commit is here:
>
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/475212
Ok, thanks, will use that one. How about
Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
which is missing in the mail you've sent, but is there in the above
reference commit?
> > Also, I think this should have Cc: stable, right?
>
> I usually let maintainers decide, but yes.
I'll be adding it. Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists