[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69b9548e-6676-75b4-4ba5-925c5fdc28ac@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:58:20 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/ftrace: multiple_kprobes: Also check for
support
On 09/08/2017 06:01 AM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> The multiple_kprobes test case fails to check for KPROBE_EVENT support.
> Add the check to prevent a false test result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc
> index 2a1cb9908746..a4fd4c851a5b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> #!/bin/sh
> # description: Register/unregister many kprobe events
>
> +[ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable
> +
> # ftrace fentry skip size depends on the machine architecture.
> # Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc64le
> case `uname -m` in
>
Hi Steve/Masami,
This patch looks good to me. Adds a check similar to the one one in
tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/functions
If you don't have objections, I will get this into 4.14-rc2 or rc3
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists