[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r2v89auk.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:25:23 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <ikent@...hat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...marydata.com>,
"viro\@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mkoutny\@suse.com" <mkoutny@...e.com>,
"linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH manpages] stat.2: correct AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT text and general revisions.
On Thu, Sep 14 2017, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 25 August 2017 at 07:32, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
>>
>> Expand on the relationship between fstatat() and the other
>> three functions, and improve the description of AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT.
>> Specifically, both stat() and lstat() act the same way
>> with respect to automounts, and that behavior matches
>> fstatat with the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag.
>>
>> The text in the NOTES is removed and places with the text for
>> AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT to improve cohesion.
>>
>> New text for a difference to be introduced in 4.14.
>
> Has the 4.14 piece gone in?
>
Yes.
Commit: 42f461482178 ("autofs: fix AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT not being honored")
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists