[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e554a428-5a6f-164a-4e9c-17dbef8ddfe7@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 15:11:16 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, Ian Kent <ikent@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...marydata.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mkoutny@...e.com" <mkoutny@...e.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH manpages] stat.2: correct AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT text and general
revisions.
On 09/15/2017 12:25 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14 2017, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On 25 August 2017 at 07:32, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Expand on the relationship between fstatat() and the other
>>> three functions, and improve the description of AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT.
>>> Specifically, both stat() and lstat() act the same way
>>> with respect to automounts, and that behavior matches
>>> fstatat with the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag.
>>>
>>> The text in the NOTES is removed and places with the text for
>>> AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT to improve cohesion.
>>>
>>> New text for a difference to be introduced in 4.14.
>>
>> Has the 4.14 piece gone in?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> Commit: 42f461482178 ("autofs: fix AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT not being honored")
Thanks. I've applied the patch.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists