lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:01:25 +0200 From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@...ronome.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bitfield.h: include <linux/build_bug.h> instead of <linux/bug.h> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:12:55 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Since commit bc6245e5efd7 ("bug: split BUILD_BUG stuff out into > <linux/build_bug.h>"), #include <linux/build_bug.h> is better > to pull minimal headers needed for BUILG_BUG() family. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists