lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:14:45 -0700 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Richard Cochran <rcochran@...utronix.de> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>, Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 2/6] net: skbuff: Add a field to support time based transmission. On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 09:41 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <rcochran@...utronix.de> > --- > include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Why skb->tstamp can not be used ? AFAIK, fact that it might be overwritten by packet captures should not hurt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists