linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARC: reset: introduce AXS10x reset driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce7885ab-b87e-ca07-234f-b63811afd86c@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:14:38 -0700
From:   Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
CC:     <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARC: reset: introduce AXS10x reset driver

Hi Philipp,

On 09/18/2017 05:07 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 17:28 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> ARC AXS10x boards support custom IP-block which allows to control
>> reset signals of selected peripherals. For example DW GMAC, etc...
>> This block is controlled via memory-mapped register (AKA CREG) which
>> represents up-to 32 reset lines. This regiter is self-clearing so we
>> don't need to deassert line after reset.
>>
>> As of today only the following lines are used:
>>   - DW GMAC - line 5
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
>> ---
>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>>    * The creg reset register is self-clearing so we don't need to clear it
>>      manually. Fixed it.
>>    * Use reset callback instead of assert/deassert pair.
>>    * Rename reset node in documentation to "reset-controller" for consistency
>>      with the other bindings.
>>    * Use devm_reset_controller_register instead of reset_controller_register
>>
>> NOTE:
>>      This driver couldn't be replaced by reset-simple driver as we mustn't
>>      read from reset register or clear it.
> 
> Thanks, I've applied this patch to the reset/next branch.

Will it be OK for you to apply the corresponding DT update for platform - that way 
I don't have to keep track of when ur branch hits mainline etc.

The chances of any ensuing conflicts are pretty rare - and easy to resolve if at all.

If so, Eugeniy can send the patch ur way !

Thx,
-Vineet