[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+a4g4s_3ULdseYG3WvrKUaXU4x_eDQZYAj-8GmNrTJ5SA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:47:08 +0200
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Victor Chibotaru <tchibo@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcov: remove #ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 03:46:46PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> There is no need to surround kaslr_offset() with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE ifdef.
>> kaslr_offset() will just return 0 if CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE isn't set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/kcov.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/kcov.c b/kernel/kcov.c
>> index 3f693a0f6f3e..2f0e7a7c7afc 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kcov.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kcov.c
>> @@ -69,9 +69,7 @@ void notrace __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(void)
>> unsigned long pos;
>> unsigned long ip = _RET_IP_;
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
>> ip -= kaslr_offset();
>> -#endif
>
> I think this is sound, but as Dmitry points out it'll mean we do some
> pointless work. For example on arm64 we have:
>
> static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
> {
> return kimage_vaddr - KIMAGE_VADDR;
> }
>
> ... where kimage_vaddr is a global variable, and KIMAGE_VADDR is a
> constant (and should be identical for !CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE kernels).
>
> I think it would be reasonable to make that:
>
> static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
> {
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE))
> return 0;
>
> return kimage_vaddr - KIMAGE_VADDR;
> }
>
> ... and simplify callers as above.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists