linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ptrace, seccomp: add support for retrieving seccomp flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJfZWxeWg9UNdwteetZtHfXcpsHsz-m1N1vzTTtYkhMyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:09:02 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, criu@...nvz.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace, seccomp: add support for retrieving seccomp flags

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:43:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Kees,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com> wrote:
>> >> > With the new SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG, we need to be able to extract these
>> >> > flags for checkpoint restore, since they describe the state of a filter.
>> >> >
>> >> > So, let's add PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FLAGS, similar to ..._GET_FILTER, which
>> >> > returns the flags of the nth filter.
>> >>
>> >> Can you split this up into factoring out the nth helper, and then
>> >> adding the new get?
>> >>
>> >> For naming, perhaps "GET_FILTER_FLAGS" instead of "GET_FLAGS" since
>> >> there may be seccomp flags in the future, etc.
>> >
>> > Sure, I'll do both of these.
>> >
>> >> Is there any sane way to add the flags to the existing GET_FILTER?
>> >
>> > I looked at this, and I don't think so. Unfortunately, we didn't use
>> > any structure for the output, it's just the raw bytes of the filter
>> > with the length used as the return value. I suppose we could append
>> > the flags after the bytes of the filter, but that seems... very ugly
>> > :). Let me know if you want to go that route.
>>
>> I think if we can make the new GET_FILTER_stuff interface more
>> extensible, we should cover any future needs for per-filter content.
>
> Ok, are you interested in something more general than
> GET_FILTER_FLAGS? Maybe GET_FILTER_METADATA with uapi struct like:
>
> struct seccomp_metadata {
>     unsigned int flags;
> };
>
> which you call by something like,
>
> struct seccomp_metadata mymeta;
>
> size = ptrace(PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER_METADATA, pid, sizeof(mymeta), &mymeta);
> if (size < 0) {
>     /* error */
> }
> if (size != sizeof(mymeta)) {
>    /* struct seccomp_metadata sizes are different */
> }
>
> ?

Yeah, I think a sizeof could work here as a way to grow the metadata
result in the future.

Adding linux-api@ to see if anyone has thoughts on the best way to
make this future-proof...

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security