[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACK8Z6HQRyjFOgubBm02zZSz_o3LOgxsNbMj0VkpwN0thfZzzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:13:56 -0700
From: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Furquan Shaikh <furquan@...gle.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: switch to suspend_late/resume_early
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com> wrote:
>> Ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/19/649
>>
>> The bus controllers should suspend the bus operations only after
>> all of the devices on the bus have suspended their device
>> completely. Since the i2c_client drivers could be talking to
>> their devices in their suspend_late() calls, lets ensure that the
>> bus is alive by that time. Thus moving the controller suspend logic to
>> suspend_late().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> index 0e65b97842b4..66dd7f844c40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
>> .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare,
>> .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete,
>> - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>> + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend,
>> dw_i2c_plat_resume,
>> NULL)
>
> No, you can't just do that.
>
> I sent patches to do it properly before my trip to LA last week, it
> shouldn't be overly difficult to find them in the mailing list
> archives. I can look them up tomorrow if need be.
Thanks, I am guessing you mean this?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9939807/
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists