[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170921141528.xre53zpxwk355uih@ninjato>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:15:28 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/6] i2c: add helpers to ease DMA handling
> > > +/**
> > > + * i2c_release_dma_safe_msg_buf - release DMA safe buffer and sync with i2c_msg
> > > + * @msg: the message to be synced with
> > > + * @buf: the buffer obtained from i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf(). May be NULL.
> > > + */
> > > +void i2c_release_dma_safe_msg_buf(struct i2c_msg *msg, u8 *buf)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!buf || buf == msg->buf)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> > > + memcpy(msg->buf, buf, msg->len);
> > > +
> > > + kfree(buf);
>
> Only free when you actually allocated it. Seems to me like you need
> to check if (!(msg->flags & I2C_M_DMA_SAFE)) before kfree.
>
> Otherwise the logic to do this will be needed in every driver
> which will get irritating fast.
Well, I return early if (buf == msg->buf) which is only true for
I2C_M_DMA_SAFE. If not, I allocated the buffer. Am I missing something?
It would be very strange to call this function if the caller allocated
the buffer manually.
Thanks for the review!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists