[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170922101245.05a26514@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:12:45 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Cleanup task->state printing
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:54:30 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> I should probably split this thing into a bunch of patches :/
Yes please. Convert form dec to hex in one patch and one patch only.
Because I'm not sure if you meant to change numbers or not.
> /* Used in tsk->state again: */
> -#define TASK_DEAD 64
> -#define TASK_WAKEKILL 128
> -#define TASK_WAKING 256
> -#define TASK_PARKED 512
> -#define TASK_NOLOAD 1024
> -#define TASK_NEW 2048
> -#define TASK_STATE_MAX 4096
> +#define TASK_PARKED 0x0040
> +#define TASK_REPORT_MAX 0x0080
>
> -#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtXZxKWPNn"
> +/* Not in TASK_REPORT: */
> +#define TASK_DEAD 0x0080
TASK_DEAD went from 64 to 128 (0x40 to 0x80)
As well as all the defines below that. Was this on purpose?
> +#define TASK_WAKEKILL 0x0100
> +#define TASK_WAKING 0x0200
> +#define TASK_NOLOAD 0x0400
> +#define TASK_NEW 0x0800
> +
> +#define TASK_STATE_MAX 0x1000
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists