[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <754f5a9f-5332-148d-2631-918fc7a7cfe9@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:12:45 -0400
From: Eric Farman <farman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
王金浦 <jinpuwang@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"KVM-ML (kvm@...r.kernel.org)" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
vcaputo@...garu.com, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sysbench throughput degradation in 4.13+
On 09/22/2017 11:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:03:39AM -0400, Eric Farman wrote:
>> Hi Peter, Rik,
>>
>> With OSS last week, I'm sure this got lost in the deluge, so here's a
>> friendly ping.
>
> Very much so, inbox is a giant trainwreck ;-)
My apologies. :)
>
>> I picked up 4.14.0-rc1 earlier this week, and still see the
>> degradation described above. Not really a surprise, since I don't see any
>> other commits in this area beyond the ones I mentioned in my original note.
>>
>> Anyway, I'm unsure what else to try or what doc to pull to help debug this,
>> and would appreciate your expertise here. We can repro this pretty easily
>> as necessary to help get to the bottom of this.
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Could you describe your sysbench setup? Are you running it on mysql or
> postgresql, what other options?
>
MySQL. We've tried a few different configs with both test=oltp and
test=threads, but both show the same behavior. What I have settled on
for my repro is the following:
sudo sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=localhost --mysql-user=root
--mysql-db=test1 --max-time=180 --max-requests=100000000 --num-threads=8
--test=oltp prepare
sudo sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-host=localhost --mysql-user=root
--mysql-db=test1 --max-time=180 --max-requests=100000000 --num-threads=8
--test=oltp run
Have also some environments where multiple sysbench instances are run
concurrently (I've tried up to 8, with db's test1-8 being specified),
but doesn't appear to much matter either.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists