[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1506347309.21121.84.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:48:29 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: julia.lawall@...6.fr, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pid: Remove pidhash
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 08:56 -0400, Gargi Sharma wrote:
> pidhash is no longer required as all the information
> can be looked up from idr tree. Also, nr_hashed represented
> the number of pids that had been hashed. Since, nr_hashed is
> no longer relevant, it has been renamed to pid_allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@...il.com>
> @@ -66,7 +59,7 @@ int pid_max_max = PID_MAX_LIMIT;
> struct pid_namespace init_pid_ns = {
> .kref = KREF_INIT(2),
> .idr = IDR_INIT,
> - .nr_hashed = PIDNS_HASH_ADDING,
> + .pid_allocated = PIDNS_HASH_ADDING,
> .level = 0,
> .child_reaper = &init_task,
> .user_ns = &init_user_ns,
>
Should PIDNS_HASH_ADDING be renamed too, now that the pidhash is
gone?
Not that I have any ideas for a better name. This patch looks good
to me. Feel free to add this line the next time you submit it:
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists