[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925141258.GA9328@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:12:58 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...riel.com,
julia.lawall@...6.fr, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] idr: Add a function idr_get()
On 09/25, Gargi Sharma wrote:
>
> idr_get(namespace, id) returns a NULL if id is not present
> in the idr tree or returns the pointer to the struct if id is
> present in the idr tree. With this function in the idr library,
> code for pid allocation can be simplified by calling this function
> instead of looking through the pidhash.
Could you explain why find_pid_ns() can't use idr_find() ?
> +void * idr_get(struct idr *idr, int *id)
> +{
> + struct radix_tree_node *node;
> + void __rcu **slot = NULL;
> +
> + __radix_tree_lookup(&idr->idr_rt, *id, &node, &slot);
so why it takes "int *", not just "int" ?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists