[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925194417.bjkw5ar6s57bkbdt@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:44:17 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when
SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/25/17 12:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> > In this case the problem is even more basic in that the driver does
> > actually depend on having hwspinlocks for any production use.
> so just add:
> depends on HWSPINLOCK
> Is that satisfactory to you?
That would then get in the way of build test coverage.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists