linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when SPI_SPRD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0c60c5e-d06f-b246-fb63-3eb507c62449@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:53:20 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when
 SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m

On 09/25/17 12:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/25/17 12:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> In this case the problem is even more basic in that the driver does
>>> actually depend on having hwspinlocks for any production use.
> 
>> so just add:
>> 	depends on HWSPINLOCK
> 
>> Is that satisfactory to you?
> 
> That would then get in the way of build test coverage.  

I don't agree, but whatever. I give up.

-- 
~Randy