[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0c60c5e-d06f-b246-fb63-3eb507c62449@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:53:20 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when
SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m
On 09/25/17 12:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/25/17 12:22, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> In this case the problem is even more basic in that the driver does
>>> actually depend on having hwspinlocks for any production use.
>
>> so just add:
>> depends on HWSPINLOCK
>
>> Is that satisfactory to you?
>
> That would then get in the way of build test coverage.
I don't agree, but whatever. I give up.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists