[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925211154.j23g4b2xmu4f3cxc@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:11:54 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when
SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:53:20PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/25/17 12:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That would then get in the way of build test coverage.
> I don't agree, but whatever. I give up.
OK. Just as a general thing it's really important that dependency
changes be thought through and express what the constraints are in ways
that reflect what's actually going on and what's useful for users, it
seems to be a frequent problem and it does get in the way.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists