[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4aa2ff15-771c-388d-a443-486808d9ae3f@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:08:35 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v4 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is
active
On 09/17/2017 10:08 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...
>> +
>> +extern struct static_key_false __sev;
>> +static inline bool __sev_active(void)
>> +{
>> + return static_branch_unlikely(&__sev);
>> +}
>
> I'm still not happy about the two's sev_active() and __sev_active()
> naming. Perhaps the __ variant should be called sev_key_active() or ...
>
Will rename it to sev_key_active() in next rev.
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists