lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <150646593710.6049.14872100814913109721.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:45:37 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, Juston Li <juston.li@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] libnvdimm,
 namespace: fix label initialization to use valid seq numbers

The set of valid sequence numbers is {1,2,3}. The specification
indicates that an implementation should consider 0 a sign of a critical
error:

    UEFI 2.7: 13.19 NVDIMM Label Protocol

    Software never writes the sequence number 00, so a correctly
    check-summed Index Block with this sequence number probably indicates a
    critical error. When software discovers this case it treats it as an
    invalid Index Block indication.

While the expectation is that the invalid block is just thrown away, the
Robustness Principle says we should fix this to make both sequence
numbers valid.

Fixes: f524bf271a5c ("libnvdimm: write pmem label set")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Reported-by: Juston Li <juston.li@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/label.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
index 9c5f108910e3..de66c02f6140 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ static int init_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, int num_labels)
 	nsindex = to_namespace_index(ndd, 0);
 	memset(nsindex, 0, ndd->nsarea.config_size);
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-		int rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, i, i*2, ND_NSINDEX_INIT);
+		int rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, i, 3 - i, ND_NSINDEX_INIT);
 
 		if (rc)
 			return rc;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ