linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:52:10 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>, will.deacon@....com,
        zjzhang@...eaurora.org, catalin.marinas@....com, bp@...e.de,
        james.morse@....com, geliangtang@...il.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        austinwc@...eaurora.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
        zhengqiang10@...wei.com, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
        huangshaoyu@...wei.com, wuquanming@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for
 ARMv8

On 09/27, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> On 9/27/2017 6:05 AM, gengdongjiu wrote:
> >Tyler, Stephen
> >
> >On 2017/9/27 3:23, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> >>>Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
> >>Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
> >>
> >>Tested this functionality using SEA support.
> >>
> >>++Stephen,
> >>
> >>Something to be aware of, this patch will conflict with https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/14/663
> >>It may make sense to just remove the conditions for the NMI configs as part of this patch or in a series with this patch to avoid merge conflicts.
> >In your patch, you only remove ACPI_APEI_SEA for the ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, do you need to remove it for the HAVE_NMI?
> From the latest comments it sounds like Stephen was going to remove
> it from both.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/350

Sent it now.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project