[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e33b84a1-def7-7098-cbcf-627de0a24295@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:29:13 +0800
From: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
CC: <will.deacon@....com>, <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <bp@...e.de>, <james.morse@....com>,
<geliangtang@...il.com>, <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <austinwc@...eaurora.org>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <john.garry@...wei.com>,
<shiju.jose@...wei.com>, <zhengqiang10@...wei.com>,
<wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>, <huangshaoyu@...wei.com>,
<wuquanming@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for
ARMv8
Hi Stephen, Tyler
On 2017/9/27 23:52, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> Something to be aware of, this patch will conflict with https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/14/663
>>>> It may make sense to just remove the conditions for the NMI configs as part of this patch or in a series with this patch to avoid merge conflicts.
>>> In your patch, you only remove ACPI_APEI_SEA for the ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, do you need to remove it for the HAVE_NMI?
>> From the latest comments it sounds like Stephen was going to remove
>> it from both.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/350
> Sent it now.
I updated my patches. hope you can review again. only a little change. thanks
[PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA notification type
[PATCH v3 2/2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8
Powered by blists - more mailing lists