[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170928082955.n7t4wlz7olsgwkfn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:29:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 11/19] x86/mm: Make STACK_TOP_MAX dynamic
* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> For boot-time switching between paging modes, we need to be able to
> change STACK_TOP_MAX at runtime.
>
> The change is trivial and it doesn't affect kernel image size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index 3fa26a61eabc..fa9300ccce1b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *x)
> IA32_PAGE_OFFSET : TASK_SIZE_MAX)
>
> #define STACK_TOP TASK_SIZE_LOW
> -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_MAX
> +#define STACK_TOP_MAX (pgtable_l5_enabled ? TASK_SIZE_MAX : DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW)
While it's only used once in fs/exec.c, why doesn't it affect kernel image size?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists