linux-kernel - RE: [patch v9 0/4] JTAG driver introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM4PR0501MB219466B15EB1314E3AF8413FB1790@AM4PR0501MB2194.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:11:42 +0000
From:   Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@...lanox.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mec@...ut.net" <mec@...ut.net>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
        system-sw-low-level <system-sw-low-level@...lanox.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "openocd-devel-owner@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <openocd-devel-owner@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch v9 0/4] JTAG driver introduction

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com [mailto:geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com]
> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:02 PM
> To: Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@...lanox.com>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Arnd Bergmann
> <arnd@...db.de>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org; Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>; Jiri Pirko
> <jiri@...nulli.us>; Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>; linux-
> serial@...r.kernel.org; mec@...ut.net; Vadim Pasternak
> <vadimp@...lanox.com>; system-sw-low-level <system-sw-low-
> level@...lanox.com>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; openocd-devel-
> owner@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-api@...r.kernel.org; David S. Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>;
> linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>; Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Subject: Re: [patch v9 0/4] JTAG driver introduction
> 
> Hi Oleksandr,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Oleksandr Shamray
> <oleksandrs@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >> [My attention was drawn by
> >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flw
> >> n.net
> >>
> %2FArticles%2F734440%2F&data=02%7C01%7Coleksandrs%40mellanox.com%7
> >>
> C97b8ba88686a42daaace08d5064b92eb%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f
> >>
> 461b%7C0%7C0%7C636421844026854216&sdata=TeHD4a3%2FBN6a5XG3Jizf5
> >> pmsyJHJjzkEzkpnqsXC6S0%3D&reserved=0]
> >> [CC linux-spi, which was never included, while linux-serial was]
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Oleksandr Shamray
> >> <oleksandrs@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >> > When a need raise up to use JTAG interface for system's devices
> >> > programming or CPU debugging, usually the user layer application
> >> > implements jtag protocol by bit-bang or using a proprietary
> >> > connection to vendor hardware.
> >> > This method can be slow and not generic.
> >> >
> >
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> >
> >> > Initial version provides the system calls set for:
> >> > - SIR (Scan Instruction Register, IEEE 1149.1 Data Register scan);
> >> > - SDR (Scan Data Register, IEEE 1149.1 Instruction Register scan);
> >> > - RUNTEST (Forces the IEEE 1149.1 bus to a run state for a specified
> >> >   number of clocks.
> >> >
> >> > SoC which are not equipped with JTAG master interface, can be built
> >> > on top of JTAG core driver infrastructure, by applying bit-banging
> >> > of TDI, TDO, TCK and TMS pins within the hardware specific driver.
> >>
> >> Or by using an SPI master?
> >>
> >
> > I think it depends on how flexible the SPI interface is. If you can
> > set it to transfer from 1 to n bits at a time, and you control the TMS
> > line in software, you should be able to use it. If the SPI interface
> > can only transfer a multiple of 8 bits at a time, then in general it would not be
> suitable for JTAG.
> 
> Sure, that depends on the actual SPI master interface.
> But I guess you can write a generic JTAG-over-SPI driver, and use a tms-gpios
> property in DT to specify how to control TMS.
> 

Yes, this is a good idea for SoC which are not equipped with JTAG hardware.

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-
> m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds