[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170929151339.GA4398@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:13:39 +0200
From: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mike.kravetz@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
punit.agrawal@....com, gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kirill@...temov.name
Subject: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: fix "treat_as_movable" condition in
htlb_alloc_mask
If hugepage_migration_supported() returns true, this renders the
hugepages_treat_as_movable sysctl completely pointless.
Let's keep this behavior optional by switching the if() condition
from || to &&.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 424b0ef08a60..ab28de0122af 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
/* Movability of hugepages depends on migration support. */
static inline gfp_t htlb_alloc_mask(struct hstate *h)
{
- if (hugepages_treat_as_movable || hugepage_migration_supported(h))
+ if (hugepages_treat_as_movable && hugepage_migration_supported(h))
return GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE;
else
return GFP_HIGHUSER;
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists