[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170929204321.GA593@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 22:43:21 +0200
From: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mike.kravetz@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
punit.agrawal@....com, gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: fix "treat_as_movable" condition in
htlb_alloc_mask
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Alexandru Moise wrote:
> If hugepage_migration_supported() returns true, this renders the
> hugepages_treat_as_movable sysctl completely pointless.
>
> Let's keep this behavior optional by switching the if() condition
> from || to &&.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 424b0ef08a60..ab28de0122af 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> /* Movability of hugepages depends on migration support. */
> static inline gfp_t htlb_alloc_mask(struct hstate *h)
> {
> - if (hugepages_treat_as_movable || hugepage_migration_supported(h))
> + if (hugepages_treat_as_movable && hugepage_migration_supported(h))
> return GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE;
> else
> return GFP_HIGHUSER;
> --
> 2.14.2
>
I seem to have terribly misunderstood the semantics of this flag wrt hugepages,
please ignore this for now.
../Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists