[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171002134504.GD19119@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 06:45:04 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] block: prepare for passing RQF_PREEMPT to request
allocation
As mentioned in the reply to Bart, I'd much rather use BLK_MQ_REQ_*
for the sane blk_get_request version (which should have the same
prototype as blk_mq_alloc_request) instead of having another flags
namespace.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists