[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171002135024.GE19119@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 06:50:24 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/6] block: support PREEMPT_ONLY
> +void blk_set_preempt_only(struct request_queue *q, bool preempt_only)
> +{
> + blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
> + if (preempt_only)
> + queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_PREEMPT_ONLY, q);
> + else
> + queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_PREEMPT_ONLY, q);
> + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_preempt_only);
What do you need the queue freeze for?
> + /*
> + * preempt_only flag has to be set after queue is frozen,
> + * so it can be checked here lockless and safely
> + */
> + if (blk_queue_preempt_only(q)) {
We can always check a single bit flag safely, so I really don't
understand that comment.
> + if (!(flags & BLK_REQ_PREEMPT))
> + goto slow_path;
> + }
> +
> if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
> return 0;
> -
> + slow_path:
Also this looks a very spaghetti, why not:
if (!blk_queue_preempt_only(q) || (flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT)) {
if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists