[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5330486D-DD91-4980-B002-6BD9255835A4@lightnvm.io>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:16:57 +0200
From: Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io>
To: Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io>
Cc: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@...era.com>,
Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] lightnvm: pblk: reduce arguments in
__pblk_rb_update_l2p
> On 2 Oct 2017, at 13.32, Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io> wrote:
>
>> On 1 Oct 2017, at 15.23, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@...era.com> wrote:
>>
>> We already pass the structure pointer so no need to pass the member.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@...era.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-rb.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-rb.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-rb.c
>> index 05e6b2e..920ffac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-rb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-rb.c
>> @@ -201,9 +201,9 @@ unsigned int pblk_rb_read_commit(struct pblk_rb *rb, unsigned int nr_entries)
>> return subm;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __pblk_rb_update_l2p(struct pblk_rb *rb, unsigned int *l2p_upd,
>> - unsigned int to_update)
>> +static int __pblk_rb_update_l2p(struct pblk_rb *rb, unsigned int to_update)
>> {
>> + unsigned int l2p_update = rb->l2p_update;
>> struct pblk *pblk = container_of(rb, struct pblk, rwb);
>> struct pblk_line *line;
>> struct pblk_rb_entry *entry;
>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int __pblk_rb_update_l2p(struct pblk_rb *rb, unsigned int *l2p_upd,
>> int flags;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < to_update; i++) {
>> - entry = &rb->entries[*l2p_upd];
>> + entry = &rb->entries[l2p_update];
>> w_ctx = &entry->w_ctx;
>>
>> flags = READ_ONCE(entry->w_ctx.flags);
>> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int __pblk_rb_update_l2p(struct pblk_rb *rb, unsigned int *l2p_upd,
>> line = &pblk->lines[pblk_tgt_ppa_to_line(w_ctx->ppa)];
>> kref_put(&line->ref, pblk_line_put);
>> clean_wctx(w_ctx);
>> - *l2p_upd = (*l2p_upd + 1) & (rb->nr_entries - 1);
>> + rb->l2p_update = (l2p_update + 1) & (rb->nr_entries - 1);
This is wrong. It should be rb->l2p_update when doing +1, otherwise you
are not using the updated l2p_update value. The result is the pipeline
stalling as the l2p pointer is left behind.
I'll fix it when picking it up.
Please test the patches before submitting.
Javier.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists