linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Change HCI marco to actual bit position

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:41:34 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "subhashj@...eaurora.org" <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "vinholikatti@...il.com" <vinholikatti@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufs: Change HCI marco to actual bit position

On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 11:52 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Currently UFS HCI uses UFS_BIT() macro to get various bit
> position for the hardware registers status bits. Which makes
> code longer instead of shorter. This macro does not improve
> code readability as well.
> Lets re-write these macro definition with the actual bit position.

Can the three patches in this series be combined into a single patch?

> -#define UFS_BIT(x)	(1L << (x))
> [ ... ]
> +#define UFS_BIT(x)     (1L << (x))

If you want to keep the three patches separate, please make sure that this
patch does not modify the UFS_BIT() definition. Please also fix the spelling
of the title of this patch (marco -> macro).

Thanks,

Bart.