[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171002215621.GS457@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:56:21 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
jhugo@...eaurora.org, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com, ahs3@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Fixup users of topology_physical_package_id
On 09/19, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> There are a few arm64 specific users (cpufreq, psci, etc) which really
> want the cluster rather than the topology_physical_package_id(). Lets
> convert those users to topology_cod_id(). That way when we start
> differentiating the socket/cluster they will continue to behave correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> ---
For:
> drivers/clk/clk-mb86s7x.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists