| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171003205227.GA48271@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:52:27 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: support issuing/waiting discard in range
Hi Chao,
Could you please rebase the following patches on top of dev-test?
f2fs-support-issuing-waiting-discard-in-range
f2fs-wrap-discard-policy
f2fs-split-discard-policy
f2fs-reduce-cmd_lock-coverage-in-__issue_discard_cmd
f2fs-trace-f2fs_remove_discard
f2fs-give-up-CP_TRIMMED_FLAG-if-it-drops-discards
It seems we need to rearrange some of patches for better review.
Thanks,
On 10/03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> > From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >
> > Fstrim intends to trim invalid blocks of filesystem only with specified
> > range and granularity, but actually, it will issue all previous cached
> > discard commands which may be out-of-range and be with unmatched
> > granularity, it's unneeded.
> >
> > In order to fix above issues, this patch introduces new helps to support
> > to issue and wait discard in range and adds a new fstrim_list for tracking
> > in-flight discard from ->fstrim.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 89b4927dcd79..cb13c7df6971 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct discard_cmd_control {
> > struct list_head pend_list[MAX_PLIST_NUM];/* store pending entries */
> > unsigned char pend_list_tag[MAX_PLIST_NUM];/* tag for pending entries */
> > struct list_head wait_list; /* store on-flushing entries */
> > + struct list_head fstrim_list; /* in-flight discard from fstrim */
> > wait_queue_head_t discard_wait_queue; /* waiting queue for wake-up */
> > unsigned int discard_wake; /* to wake up discard thread */
> > struct mutex cmd_lock;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index dedf0209d820..088936c61905 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -845,9 +845,11 @@ void __check_sit_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >
> > /* this function is copied from blkdev_issue_discard from block/blk-lib.c */
> > static void __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > - struct discard_cmd *dc)
> > + struct discard_cmd *dc, bool fstrim)
> > {
> > struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > + struct list_head *wait_list = fstrim ? &(dcc->fstrim_list) :
> > + &(dcc->wait_list);
> > struct bio *bio = NULL;
> >
> > if (dc->state != D_PREP)
> > @@ -869,7 +871,7 @@ static void __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
> > bio->bi_opf |= REQ_SYNC;
> > submit_bio(bio);
> > - list_move_tail(&dc->list, &dcc->wait_list);
> > + list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> > __check_sit_bitmap(sbi, dc->start, dc->start + dc->len);
> >
> > f2fs_update_iostat(sbi, FS_DISCARD, 1);
> > @@ -1054,6 +1056,68 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > + unsigned int start, unsigned int end,
> > + unsigned int granularity)
> > +{
> > + struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > + struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
> > + struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
> > + struct discard_cmd *dc;
> > + struct blk_plug plug;
> > + int issued;
> > +
> > +next:
> > + issued = 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
> > +
> > + dc = (struct discard_cmd *)__lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
> > + NULL, start,
> > + (struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
> > + (struct rb_entry **)&next_dc,
> > + &insert_p, &insert_parent, true);
> > + if (!dc)
> > + dc = next_dc;
> > +
> > + blk_start_plug(&plug);
> > +
> > + while (dc && dc->lstart <= end) {
> > + struct rb_node *node;
> > +
> > + if (dc->len < granularity)
> > + goto skip;
> > +
> > + if (dc->state != D_PREP) {
> > + list_move_tail(&dc->list, &dcc->fstrim_list);
> > + goto skip;
> > + }
> > +
> > + __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc, true);
> > +
> > + if (++issued >= DISCARD_ISSUE_RATE) {
> > + start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> > +
> > + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> > + mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > +
> > + schedule();
> > +
> > + goto next;
> > + }
> > +skip:
> > + node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
> > + dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, rb_node);
> > +
> > + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> > + mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool issue_cond)
> > {
> > struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > @@ -1076,22 +1140,19 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool issue_cond)
> >
> > /* Hurry up to finish fstrim */
> > if (dcc->pend_list_tag[i] & P_TRIM) {
> > - __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> > + __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc, false);
> > issued++;
> > -
> > - if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> > - break;
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > if (!issue_cond) {
> > - __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> > + __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc, false);
> > issued++;
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > if (is_idle(sbi)) {
> > - __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> > + __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dc, false);
> > issued++;
> > } else {
> > io_interrupted = true;
> > @@ -1145,10 +1206,14 @@ static void __wait_one_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > }
> >
> > -static void __wait_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool wait_cond)
> > +static void __wait_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool wait_cond,
> > + block_t start, block_t end,
> > + unsigned int granularity,
> > + bool fstrim)
> > {
> > struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > - struct list_head *wait_list = &(dcc->wait_list);
> > + struct list_head *wait_list = fstrim ? &(dcc->fstrim_list) :
> > + &(dcc->wait_list);
> > struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
> > bool need_wait;
> >
> > @@ -1157,6 +1222,10 @@ static void __wait_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool wait_cond)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tmp, wait_list, list) {
> > + if (dc->lstart + dc->len <= start || end <= dc->lstart)
> > + continue;
> > + if (dc->len < granularity)
> > + continue;
> > if (!wait_cond || (dc->state == D_DONE && !dc->ref)) {
> > wait_for_completion_io(&dc->wait);
> > __remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
>
> So, we need to add this on top of the patch that fixes the bug reported
> by Juhyung, right?
>
> if (fstrim)
> need_wait = true;
>
> Thanks,
>
> > @@ -1174,6 +1243,11 @@ static void __wait_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool wait_cond)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool wait_cond)
> > +{
> > + __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, wait_cond, 0, UINT_MAX, 1, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > /* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
> > void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
> > {
> > @@ -1209,12 +1283,12 @@ void stop_discard_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -/* This comes from f2fs_put_super and f2fs_trim_fs */
> > +/* This comes from f2fs_put_super */
> > void f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > {
> > __issue_discard_cmd(sbi, false);
> > __drop_discard_cmd(sbi);
> > - __wait_discard_cmd(sbi, false);
> > + __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, false);
> > }
> >
> > static void mark_discard_range_all(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > @@ -1258,7 +1332,7 @@ static int issue_discard_thread(void *data)
> >
> > issued = __issue_discard_cmd(sbi, true);
> > if (issued) {
> > - __wait_discard_cmd(sbi, true);
> > + __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, true);
> > wait_ms = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
> > } else {
> > wait_ms = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
> > @@ -1569,6 +1643,7 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > dcc->pend_list_tag[i] |= P_ACTIVE;
> > }
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dcc->wait_list);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dcc->fstrim_list);
> > mutex_init(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > atomic_set(&dcc->issued_discard, 0);
> > atomic_set(&dcc->issing_discard, 0);
> > @@ -2196,7 +2271,8 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
> > {
> > __u64 start = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(range->start);
> > __u64 end = start + F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(range->len) - 1;
> > - unsigned int start_segno, end_segno;
> > + unsigned int start_segno, end_segno, cur_segno;
> > + block_t start_block, end_block;
> > struct cp_control cpc;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > @@ -2217,12 +2293,17 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
> > start_segno = (start <= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)) ? 0 : GET_SEGNO(sbi, start);
> > end_segno = (end >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi)) ? MAIN_SEGS(sbi) - 1 :
> > GET_SEGNO(sbi, end);
> > +
> > + start_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, start_segno);
> > + end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, end_segno + 1);
> > +
> > cpc.reason = CP_DISCARD;
> > cpc.trim_minlen = max_t(__u64, 1, F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(range->minlen));
> >
> > /* do checkpoint to issue discard commands safely */
> > - for (; start_segno <= end_segno; start_segno = cpc.trim_end + 1) {
> > - cpc.trim_start = start_segno;
> > + for (cur_segno = start_segno; cur_segno <= end_segno;
> > + cur_segno = cpc.trim_end + 1) {
> > + cpc.trim_start = cur_segno;
> >
> > if (sbi->discard_blks == 0)
> > break;
> > @@ -2230,7 +2311,7 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
> > cpc.trim_end = end_segno;
> > else
> > cpc.trim_end = min_t(unsigned int,
> > - rounddown(start_segno +
> > + rounddown(cur_segno +
> > BATCHED_TRIM_SEGMENTS(sbi),
> > sbi->segs_per_sec) - 1, end_segno);
> >
> > @@ -2242,9 +2323,13 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
> >
> > schedule();
> > }
> > - /* It's time to issue all the filed discards */
> > - mark_discard_range_all(sbi);
> > - f2fs_wait_discard_bios(sbi);
> > +
> > + start_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, start_segno);
> > + end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, min(cur_segno, end_segno) + 1);
> > +
> > + __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, start_block, end_block, cpc.trim_minlen);
> > + __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, false, start_block, end_block,
> > + cpc.trim_minlen, true);
> > out:
> > range->len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(cpc.trimmed);
> > return err;
> > --
> > 2.14.1.145.gb3622a4ee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists