linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Improve softlockup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171003205429.m5k5tawge74ytjjx@pd.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2017 22:54:29 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Improve softlockup_panic= description text

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:39:17PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So I hate to be fussy.  (OK, perhaps I like it, but I'll act reluctant
> anyway...:)  If it's an integer value, how can it be null?  Can we say "a
> non-zero value" instead?

non-zero yap, I was looking for that version but somehow it evaded
me. Can you change it while applying or should I send a new one?

> I'd take out the quotes too, but that's extra credit...

Well, a value can't really instruct, thus the quotes...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.