linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 5/8] percpu-refcount: introduce __percpu_ref_tryget

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171003192039.GB5362@ming.t460p>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 03:20:40 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
        Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/8] percpu-refcount: introduce
 __percpu_ref_tryget_live

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:14:59AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:04:03PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Block layer need to call this function after holding
> > rcu lock in a real hot path, so introduce this helper.
> 
> The patch description is too anemic.  It doesn't even describe what
> changes are being made, let alone justifying them.

Sorry for Cc you, and this change is needed by the following
patch:

	https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=150703956929333&w=2

Block layer need to call percpu_ref_tryget_live()
with holding RCU read lock, given it is a hot I/O
path, that is why I make this patch so that we can
avoid nested RCU read lock and save a bit cost.

--
Ming