[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507056023.2567.1.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:40:24 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jthumshirn@...e.de" <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
"martin@...htvoll.de" <martin@...htvoll.de>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
"hare@...e.com" <hare@...e.com>, "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"cavery@...hat.com" <cavery@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/8] percpu-refcount: introduce
__percpu_ref_tryget_live
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 22:04 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Block layer need to call this function after holding
> rcu lock in a real hot path, so introduce this helper.
Since it is allowed to nest rcu_read_lock_sched() calls I don't think
that this patch is necessary.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists