lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004142929.GA10240@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:29:29 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Meng Xu <mengxu.gatech@...il.com>
Cc:     jslaby@...e.com, kilobyte@...band.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        meng.xu@...ech.edu, sanidhya@...ech.edu, taesoo@...ech.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: vt: remove multi-fetch, derive font.height from
 font.data

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:12:38AM -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> In con_font_set(), when we need to guess font height (for
> compat reasons?), the current approach uses multiple userspace
> fetches, i.e., get_user(tmp, &charmap[32*i+h-1]), to derive
> the height. This has two drawbacks:
> 
> 1. performance: accessing userspace memory is less efficient than
> directly de-reference the byte
> 
> 2. security: a more critical problem is that the height derived
> might not match with the actual font.data. This is because a user
> thread might race condition to change the memory of op->data after
> the op->height guessing but before the second fetch: font.data =
> memdup_user(op->data, size). Leaving font.height = 32 while the
> actual height is 1 or vice-versa.
> 
> This patch tries to resolve both issues by re-locating the height
> guessing part after the font.data is fetched in. In this way, the
> userspace data is fetched in one shot and we directly dereference
> the font.data in kernel space to probe for the height.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Meng Xu <mengxu.gatech@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Is this a v2 patch?  If so, please mark it as such and say what changed
below the --- line.  The kernel documenation says how to do this
correctly.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ