[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171004151431.GI3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:14:31 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, pmladek@...e.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] early_printk: Add simple serialization to
early_vprintk()
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 04:52:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:43:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > My question is not about ordering, but about coherency. Can you have
> > one CPU read a variable that goes into cache, and keep using the cached
> > variable every time the program asks to read it, instead of going out
> > to memory.
>
> No, not on a coherent system.
What Peter said. And if you use READ_ONCE() for the reads, than as
far as I know, all the systems that the Linux kernel supports are
coherent systems.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists