[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004131430.6e459b0a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:14:30 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
rajvi.jingar@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/33] ring-buffer: Add interface for setting
absolute time stamps
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:59:43 -0500
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> + /*
> + * New timestamps may not be consistent with the previous setting.
> + * Reset the buffer so that it doesn't have incomparable timestamps.
I would like to make the ring buffer robust enough to handle both. Can
this be done?
-- Steve
> + */
> + tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->trace_buffer);
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists