[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171004133414.4840c351@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:34:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
rajvi.jingar@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/33] tracing: Generalize per-element hist trigger
data
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:59:56 -0500
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -1742,7 +1746,8 @@ static void hist_trigger_stacktrace_print(struct seq_file *m,
> seq_printf(m, "%s: [%llx] %-55s", field_name,
> uval, str);
> } else if (key_field->flags & HIST_FIELD_FL_EXECNAME) {
> - char *comm = elt->private_data;
> + struct hist_elt_data *elt_data = elt->private_data;
Weren't we going to add a "if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!elt_data)) return;" here?
-- Steve
> + char *comm = elt_data->comm;
>
> uval = *(u64 *)(key + key_field->offset);
> seq_printf(m, "%s: %-16s[%10llu]", field_name,
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists