linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/rockchip: analogix_dp: Use mutex rather than spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171004175346.11956-1-kernel@esmil.dk>
Date:   Wed,  4 Oct 2017 19:53:46 +0200
From:   Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
To:     Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: analogix_dp: Use mutex rather than spinlock

On the Samsung Chromebook Plus I get this error with 4.14-rc3:

BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/3:1/50/0x00000002
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.14.0-0.rc3-kevin #2
Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT)
Workqueue: events analogix_dp_psr_work
Call trace:
[<ffffff80080873b0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x320
[<ffffff80080876e4>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[<ffffff8008606d38>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc
[<ffffff80080c6b5c>] __schedule_bug+0x4c/0x70
[<ffffff80086188c0>] __schedule+0x3f0/0x458
[<ffffff8008618960>] schedule+0x38/0xa0
[<ffffff800861c20c>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x84/0xe8
[<ffffff800861c2a0>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18
[<ffffff800861bcec>] usleep_range+0x64/0x78
[<ffffff8008415a6c>] analogix_dp_transfer+0x16c/0x340
[<ffffff8008412550>] analogix_dpaux_transfer+0x10/0x18
[<ffffff80083ceb14>] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x4c/0xf0
[<ffffff80083cf614>] drm_dp_dpcd_write+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffff8008413b98>] analogix_dp_disable_psr+0x60/0xa8
[<ffffff800840da3c>] analogix_dp_psr_work+0x4c/0x90
[<ffffff80080bb09c>] process_one_work+0x1d4/0x348
[<ffffff80080bb258>] worker_thread+0x48/0x478
[<ffffff80080c11fc>] kthread+0x12c/0x130
[<ffffff8008084290>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

Changing rockchip_dp_device::psr_lock to a mutex rather
than spinlock seems to fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
index 9606121fa185..d8f72d87ef08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device {
 	struct reset_control     *rst;
 
 	struct work_struct	 psr_work;
-	spinlock_t		 psr_lock;
+	struct mutex             psr_lock;
 	unsigned int             psr_state;
 
 	const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *data;
@@ -83,21 +83,20 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device {
 static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled)
 {
 	struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder);
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev))
 		return;
 
 	dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit");
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
+	mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock);
 	if (enabled)
 		dp->psr_state = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE;
 	else
 		dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE;
 
 	schedule_work(&dp->psr_work);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock);
 }
 
 static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct rockchip_dp_device *dp =
 				container_of(work, typeof(*dp), psr_work);
 	int ret;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	ret = rockchip_drm_wait_vact_end(dp->encoder.crtc,
 					 PSR_WAIT_LINE_FLAG_TIMEOUT_MS);
@@ -114,12 +112,12 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
+	mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock);
 	if (dp->psr_state == EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE)
 		analogix_dp_enable_psr(dp->dev);
 	else
 		analogix_dp_disable_psr(dp->dev);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock);
 }
 
 static int rockchip_dp_pre_init(struct rockchip_dp_device *dp)
@@ -381,7 +379,7 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
 	dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown;
 	dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes;
 
-	spin_lock_init(&dp->psr_lock);
+	mutex_init(&dp->psr_lock);
 	dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE;
 	INIT_WORK(&dp->psr_work, analogix_dp_psr_work);
 
-- 
2.14.2